🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #44181

Design Choices (was Re: What do I want to see in the Apple of the 90's?)

#44181
From: Ronald C.F. Antony
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1989 17:06
48 lines
3054 bytes
>> As soon as you print on a printer with it's own postscript engine, there
.> is hardly any noticable slowdown, there is complete spooling as in any UNIX
.> system.
>
>...and the printer most likely to be used...
>
>OK, OK, that's not fair. But it does illuminate a point: we're talking about
>standard features. Otherwise, I could wail about how easy it is to install
>EtherNet support on the Mac.

What I consider as an important design choice is the consistent
support of postscript. NeXT would be stupid to eat up it's
resources to develop another postscript printer. There are 
enough on the marktet. The important question was, is there a
way to provide users with a relatively cheap PERSONAL PRINTER.
The cleanest way to do this, without going the way of the image
writer, was to make a non-intelligent postscript printer. I do
not think, that NeXT really believes, that their printer would
be of any use as a network printer, unless you dedicate a whole
cube to it.
Printers are not standerd, neiter for the NeXT nor for the Mac.
In neither case you are bound to the respective manufacturer.
The only thing NeXT wanted to make sure is, that there should
not emerge a dual standard for printing (postscript for the high
end, and something else for the personal range). The only way to
do this, was the solution they chose. (Well, they could have
built upon the HP-deskjet, but this would have been even slower, 
and someone who pays in the order of 10k$ for the system, is likely
not to look if the printer costs 1500 or 2000$)

> I was trying to communicate was that Apple pretty
>much puts developers in a straighjacket. And I don't mean that negatively, of
>course. I mean it to be the best possible thing they could be doing. Mac would
>have failed without the straightjacket. NeXT seems to have the Toolbox without
>the conscience.

Well, I think this can be answered only over time. In the NeXT
technical documentation is carefully documented how the menues
should look like, where ne items should be inserted. Then the
AppKit removes a lot of decisions from the programer. If however
NeXT can keep it's developers disciplined, is another question...

Ronald
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists
in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the
unreasonable man." - Bernhard Shaw | rca@cs.brown.edu or antony@cogsci.bitnet
Technical Details
Message-ID: <23311@brunix.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!brunix!rca
References: <23143@brunix.UUCP> <3361@hub.UUCP>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!brunix!rca
From: rca@cs.brown.edu (Ronald C.F. Antony)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.next
Subject: Design Choices (was Re: What do I want to see in the Apple of the 90's?)
Message-ID: <23311@brunix.UUCP>
Date: 19 Dec 89 17:06:49 GMT
References: <23143@brunix.UUCP> <3361@hub.UUCP>
Sender: news@brunix.UUCP
Reply-To: rca@cs.brown.edu (Ronald C.F. Antony)
Organization: Brown University Department of Computer Science
Lines: 48