Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #44252NeXT not open architecture?
From: Eric Thayer
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1989 15:41
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1989 15:41
12 lines
1100 bytes
1100 bytes
In article <3362@hub.UUCP> 6600pete@hub.UUCP writes: >Rather, I was trying to show that putting Ether on the motherboard and not >also including enough open architecture features was probably not the best >design decision. In what way is the NeXT lacking in open architecture features? If you mean that they have lagged in getting a Bus interface chip to hardware developers I can agree. But otherwise, pending development of the hardware, you can plug anything you want in the remaining slots. -- Eric H. Thayer School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon (412) 268-7679 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7362@pt.cs.cmu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sunybcs!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!f.word.cs.cmu.edu!ehtReferences:
<23147@brunix.UUCP> <3362@hub.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sunybcs!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!f.word.cs.cmu.edu!eht From: eht@f.word.cs.cmu.edu (Eric Thayer) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.next Subject: NeXT not open architecture? Message-ID: <7362@pt.cs.cmu.edu> Date: 20 Dec 89 15:41:27 GMT References: <23147@brunix.UUCP> <3362@hub.UUCP> Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI Lines: 12