Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #4467Re: Cheap disks considered harmful (was Re: HELP! More Jasmine
From: NetNews
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 1989 07:29
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 1989 07:29
66 lines
3681 bytes
3681 bytes
Summary: Price does not necessarily mean quality References: <780049@hpvcfs1.HP.COM> <2330@infmx.UUCP> Reply-To: c3ar@zaphod.uchicago.edu (Walter C3arlip) Followup-To: /dev/null Distribution: na Organization: Dept. of Mathematics, Univ. of Chicago From: c3ar@daisy.uchicago.edu (Walter C3arlip) Path: daisy!c3ar Warning: Flame ON In article <2330@infmx.UUCP> cortesi@infmx.UUCP (David Cortesi) writes: >In article <780049@hpvcfs1.HP.COM> stevem@hpvcfs1.HP.COM (Steve Miller) writes: >>I have another friend that wants to buy an inexpensive 20-40 Meg external >>hard disk and I don't know what to recommend. Is there any lower cost >>hard-disk vendor that's had a good track record? > >Does this approach not seem just a trace short-sighted? >Every hard-disk posting seems to assume that price is the most important >attribute of a drive. Price is to be considered before anything else. >I think that is very foolish! > >There may be exceptions, but in a market as competitive as that for >hard disks, a higher price will reflect a higher quality. I could not let this pass without defending Steve's posting: Steve explicitly asked for hard-disk vendors with a *good track record*. This is a completely reasonable question to pose to the net. It is definitely not true that a higher price reflects higher quality: in fact higher price is much more likely to reflect greater brand name recognition. It would be very easy to give numerous examples of this phenomenon (e.g., IBM manufactured pcs versus some of the IBM clones), but lets stick to disk drives. Many of the available disk drives use identical drive mechanisms--the differences lying in software, packaging, and support. When I purchased my external drive (a generic box with Quantum 40Mb mechanism) I did a lot of comparison shopping. The drive I bought came in a sturdy well-designed box with all the features of better known "brand-name" drives, but cost hundreds of dollars less than better known drives with the same Quantum 40. I heard from NET postings that the company I used has an excellent track record with respect to repairs, and the drive came with an unusually long warranty and excellent software. Price and quality simply do not correlate. Recently, I have also been looking into removable cartridge drives. Again, these drives all use the same cartridge mechanisms and the differences are all in packaging, software, and support. None-the-less, prices range from $850.00 to $1799.00 for a single cartridge drive. The general trend is for the better known companies, i.e., the ones that advertise more, to charge more for their drives. I don't believe the price gives any indication of quality in this situation either. Flame OFF --Walter _____________________________________________________________________________ Walter C3arlip c3ar@zaphod.uchicago.edu (the "3" is silent) c3ar%zaphod@UCHIMVS1.bitnet _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ Walter C3arlip c3ar@zaphod.uchicago.edu (the "3" is silent) c3ar%zaphod@UCHIMVS1.bitnet _____________________________________________________________________________
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5379@tank.uchicago.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!tank!newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!tank!news From: news@tank.uchicago.edu (NetNews) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Cheap disks considered harmful (was Re: HELP! More Jasmine Message-ID: <5379@tank.uchicago.edu> Date: 13 Sep 89 07:29:46 GMT Organization: University of Chicago Lines: 66