🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #45148

Re: Royal Fonts vs. ATM

#45148
From: Piper Keairnes
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1990 16:02
29 lines
2513 bytes
<6523@wpi.wpi.edu> macman@wpi.wpi.edu (Christopher Silverberg) writes:
>PK> Surely everyone who has invested a great deal of money in Adobe
>PK> fonts will want to use both font types. Sure would be nice if
>PK> System 7 could display the Adobe fonts. Anyways, nice job Apple!
> 
>According to some reports that i've heard, System 7 MAY support Adobe fonts.
>At least Apple is willing to make the effort at doing that... whether this
>becomes a reality with the actual release of system 7, who knows...

   I've heard of hopes and dreams, but I seriously doubt that that will
happen. Whether this be true or not, I believe that one primary reason for
Apple's intent to use Royal INSTEAD of Postscript is that the licenseing
for Postscript costs an enormous amount. Ever wonder why the difference between
a plain laser printer and a postscript-compatible printer is rarely less than
$1000 ?? Adobe is out to make money on a good product just like everyone else!
It would seem as though Apple is going to make a FULL effort to have their
Royal technology become a standard or at least very good competition.
   I have heard that ATM is supposed to become compatible with System 7 and
that seems to be the best route to go for those people with a large investment
in Adobe typefaces. However, the other competitors in the typeface world will
be left a step behind. Perhaps each company will come out with an individual
INIT that will allow the display of their fonts on the screen. But to think
that Apple will invest a great amount of money to support a respectable amount
of the typeface technologies out there is absurd.

+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Piper Keairnes | ar4@mentor.cc.purdue.edu |      General Consultant       |
| (317) 495-4273 |   Macintosh Enthusiast   | Purdue Univ. Computing Center |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Technical Details
Message-ID: <6302@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!purdue!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!ar4
References: <Dec.8.18.09.58.1989.6188@galaxy.rutgers.edu> <844@sahiways.gov.au> <1693@intercon.com> <6265@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <6523@wpi.wpi.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!purdue!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!ar4
From: ar4@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Piper Keairnes)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Royal Fonts vs. ATM
Message-ID: <6302@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
Date: 10 Jan 90 16:02:38 GMT
References: <Dec.8.18.09.58.1989.6188@galaxy.rutgers.edu> <844@sahiways.gov.au> <1693@intercon.com> <6265@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <6523@wpi.wpi.edu>
Reply-To: ar4@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Piper Keairnes)
Organization: Purdue University
Lines: 29