🚀 go-pugleaf

bezanson@adobe.COM (Brian Bezanson) writes:


>== Stuff Deleted ==


>The ATM does a very good job at small sizes on non-PostScript devices. The
>reason large type was used for the ads were probably that it is more
>impressive at first sight, and most users will have already seen smaller sizes
>on their screens already.

Does the type quality differ greatly (or at all) between the Imagewriter I and 
II printers?  

>With small sizes (10, 12, 14) you'll still want to use the bitmaps for screen
>images (ATM will drop in for the printer when needed), they will save you
>speed (no building needed) and memory (already created). You'll get results at
>7 point - 17 point (using your under 18 point scenario) that are better than
>anything you can get with current quickdraw/systems.

How long does it take, and when are fonts "built?"  


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ric                           "They're probably foreigners
Bretschneider                       with ways different from our own."

  These ill considered and poorly constructed ideas are my own,
           and I love every of them one dearly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------