Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #4642Re: Cheap disks considered harmful
From: gillies
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1989 05:56
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1989 05:56
40 lines
2553 bytes
2553 bytes
I am a firm believer that some drive manufacturers produce inferior disk drive-units. A close friend of mine, a mechanical engineer at Seagate, told me (two years ago) that Seagate was using very questionable practices on its high-density drive line. They were taking drives that fail the performance / reliability tests, and swapping parts between the failing drives until they barely met spec, and then shipping them out as high-quality drives. This is something to do with mature technology (10Mb, 20Mb) drives, but not technology that is pushing limits, like the high-density drives. In other words, "Two wrongs make a right!" Maybe Seagate has changed this practice by now. They have always had the lowest-cost drives in the industry, and you have to wonder, why is the price so low? I went for a Quantum-80 (internal) drive, because Quantum has ALWAYS specialized in high-density (30+Mb) (14", 8", 5", 3.5", ...) drives, and is one of the oldest manufacturers in silicon valley. I had personal experience with 8" Quantum drives on Xerox 8010 workstations. I bought mine from CMS, which means they wrote the ROM software for it, and provided a floppy disk of software. I would also recommend CDC, since they are one of the oldest 3rd-party disk-drive makers ANYWHERE. For a while, they were the biggest and most successful makers of mainframe disk drives. This track record is something to consider. I'm not saying Quantum or CDC drives don't break, but I believe some other manufacturers (Seagate) might give their customers more headaches, on average. Occasionally, an end-unit manufacturer screws up the driver software. This happened a while back with the disk cache in Cirrus drives. The cache was not writing through regularly, and if your mac crashed you would lose a lot of work. I believe this problem has been corrected. Don't buy solely on price. Buy based on drive-unit manufacturer. Buy based on the end-unit manufacturer. Buy based on access speed. Look at price, but don't make it your primary consideration!!!!!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8400159@m.cs.uiuc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!m.cs.uiuc.edu!gilliesReferences:
<5379@tank.uchicago.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!m.cs.uiuc.edu!gillies From: gillies@m.cs.uiuc.edu Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Cheap disks considered harmful Message-ID: <8400159@m.cs.uiuc.edu> Date: 15 Sep 89 05:56:00 GMT References: <5379@tank.uchicago.edu> Lines: 40 Nf-ID: #R:tank.uchicago.edu:5379:m.cs.uiuc.edu:8400159:000:2053 Nf-From: m.cs.uiuc.edu!gillies Sep 15 00:56:00 1989