🚀 go-pugleaf

    #{v_mac.8}
    IN ARTICLE: <651@runxtsa.runx.oz.au>,
		clubmac@runxtsa.runx.oz.au (Jason Haines) WRITES:

>   [Ranting deleted - we've all read it already.]

    IN ARTICLE: <7604@yunexus.UUCP>, gall@yunexus.UUCP (Norm Gall) WRITES:

>   woodl@physc1.byu.edu writes:
>
>   | I would expect a LOT better from a senior VP of a Mac User's group!!!
>
>   Yes, indeed, I thought the invective was a little tame...
>
>   (note lack of smileys)

    Without any rational explanation of his ill favour, Mr Haines fulminates
    to no good purpose - unless we are expected to accept his condemnation
    of the program without question; the only fact with which we are
    supplied is that the program is large - hardly a capital offence. Having
    used MacSnoop by the same author for some time without any problems, I
    for one, being entirely unacquainted with Mr Haines, would need
    something more concrete on which to base my opinions. I wonder why it
    wasn't considered necessary to provide any useful information as to the
    precursors to this vilification? As it is, I am simply left with the
    impression that something went wrong, and someone didn't have a backup
    ...
-- 
    Another Fine Product from <mcvax!ukc!icdoc!bilpin!jim> <jim@bilpin.uucp>
			   {JimG : Hatfield, England}
		  This line has been intentionally left blank