🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3573.25f387de@vax5.cit.cornell.edu> ke2y@vax5.cit.cornell.edu writes:
>
>  Not that I think it will be a bad upgrade, but...  I just recently spent a
>good bit of money on Prototyper 2.1.  This seemed to work fine with THINK
>Pascal 2.01, but their manual claimed that owners of earlier versions of
>THINK Pascal may have to do a good bit of work to use it.
>
>  My concern is whether this will be true of THINK Pascal 3.0 and Prototyper
>2.1 - will I be able to use them together "as is" or will I have to either
>do a bit of hacking or wait until Prototyper upgrades?

	Prototyper 2.1 generates Pascal which took advantage of features
which were available in THINK Pascal 2.0 but were not available in
THINK Pascal 1.0. Since 3.0 is completely upward-compatible (with the exception
being a change in how arrays and records are packed) from 2.0, this should
not be a problem.

R.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Rich Siegel
 Staff Software Developer
 Symantec Corporation, Language Products Group
 Internet: siegel@endor.harvard.edu
 UUCP: ..harvard!endor!siegel

"When someone who makes four hundred and fifty dollars an hour wants to
tell you something for free, it's a good idea to listen."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~