🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1990Mar9.024332.495@Neon.Stanford.EDU>, kaufman@Neon.Stanford.EDU (Marc T. Kaufman) writes:
> 
> So what's MacNosy? Chopped liver?  Of course you have enough source.  Unless
> Apple doesn't want to (or can't because of contract reasons) look at it.
> 
> Marc Kaufman (kaufman@Neon.stanford.edu)

  Excuse me, but if I understand you correctly, you are implying that MacinTalk
should be disassembled/reverse-compiled by someone (Apple?) so that a bug-fix
can be made to allow it to work with System 7.

  Generally, most licensing agreements specifically prohibit disassembly and
reverse-compilation of the code (and generally do not allow ANY modifications
to the code at all).  As an end-user of this product, typically you are also
bound to this agreement that Apple apparently signed.

  Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong in any of these assumptions.

  Considering the legal battles that everyone seems to be getting into these
days, I know I'm more than a bit hesitant in playing around with this. 

                                               --John

===============================================================================
|  John T. Chapman                       |                                    |
|                                        |  Witty message under repair...     |
|  ke2y@vax5.cit.cornell.edu             |                                    |
|  ke2y@crnlvax5.bitnet                  |                                    |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|       Disclaimer: These opinions are mine.  You can't have them!            |
===============================================================================