Re: Long Live Macintalk!

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #47972

#47972

From: J.COOK
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 1990 13:59

14 lines
1101 bytes

Re: The demise of MacInTalk with System 7.0

Since the thing is so darned popular, why doesn't Apple just contract the
original vendor for an update?  I can't believe the fee to be that steep.
That failing, why don't they BUY the source?  Or, if the original product
was just a fast hack for the original Mac launch in 1984, then why not
hack a new one - the stuff to do it should be a lot more public (read:
published) now.

Jim Cook (J.COOK@ENS.PRIME.COM)
Prime Computer, 500 Old Conn. Path, Framingham, Mass.
"The obvious question for a cheap price.  The not-so-obvious for a little more.
 These questions are mine, not Prime's."

Technical Details

Message-ID: <166000019@ENS.Prime.COM>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!think!mintaka!bloom-beacon!primerd!ENI!ENS!J.COOK

References: <14377@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!think!mintaka!bloom-beacon!primerd!ENI!ENS!J.COOK
From: J.COOK@ENS.Prime.COM
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Long Live Macintalk!
Message-ID: <166000019@ENS.Prime.COM>
Date: 11 Mar 90 13:59:00 GMT
References: <14377@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>
Lines: 14
Nf-ID: #R:phoenix.Princeton.EDU:-1437700:ENS:166000019:000:633
Nf-From: ENS.Prime.COM!J.COOK    Mar 11 13:59:00 1990

Reply to Parent Message