🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #48092

Re: Video card reviews, why no mention of Quicktime performance ?

#48092
From: Timberwoof
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 07:27
21 lines
2332 bytes
In article 
<kob3nospamplease-0A5D2B.17520801072002@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>,
 Kenton <kob3nospamplease@optusnet.com.au> wrote:

> One of the things I look for in a graphics card is 3D game performance, 
> but another is Quicktime performance for applications like Final Cut Pro 
> and imovie. However no reviews mention the latter. Why isn't it so ?
> 
> I emailed the guy from xlr8 your mac and he said most consumers aren't 
> interested in it, however I think alot of industry people would be.

That sort of response is often a journalist's way of saying "I'm not 
interested in that," "I hadn't thought of that," or "I don't understand 
that." It's a technical reviewer's job not only to measure a system's 
performance but also to explain why any particular measurement is 
important.

-- 
Timberwoof <timberwoof at infernosoft dot com> Chief Perpetrator
Infernosoft: Putting the No in Innovation. http://www.infernosoft.com
"The opposite of hardware is not easyware." 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <timberwoof.spam-811D22.00273402072002@typhoon.sonic.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!HSNX.atgi.net!feed.news.sonic.net!typhoon.sonic.net!not-for-mail
References: <kob3nospamplease-0A5D2B.17520801072002@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fb802,839190aa7783ef92
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb802,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b5e3,839190aa7783ef92
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b5e3,public
X-Google-Thread: 10cbb9,839190aa7783ef92
X-Google-Attributes: gid10cbb9,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-02 00:30:19 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!HSNX.atgi.net!feed.news.sonic.net!typhoon.sonic.net!not-for-mail
From: Timberwoof <timberwoof.spam@infernosoft.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,aus.computers.mac,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Video card reviews, why no mention of Quicktime performance ?
Organization: Infernosoft
References: <kob3nospamplease-0A5D2B.17520801072002@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.1 (PPC)
X-Face: /+dsZp_X}b*<_Q]W|ZY*WQYU`Xi<3eZbDC3g_TW[I&?HD@BcBbCrwy\8|Ii~* 2Ah/Eb'6n=8d\/(&!2]H*u$pLjt<X6Z9*L*xd|}=1C?4<azN:f}wmy0kjc`X0]pZS.hq qO-E_{y9<__y1p)jo/rY'yC0k;<uyZxJ7UC=aJ(6EX&r$
Message-ID: <timberwoof.spam-811D22.00273402072002@typhoon.sonic.net>
Lines: 21
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 07:27:30 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.204.188.144
X-Complaints-To: abuse@sonic.net
X-Trace: typhoon.sonic.net 1025594850 209.204.188.144 (Tue, 02 Jul 2002 00:27:30 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 00:27:30 PDT