Re: SIMM pricing

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #482

#482

From: Ken Hancock
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 1989 02:41

14 lines
1081 bytes

[stuff about x8 SIMMs being more expensive than x9 IBM SIMMs deleted]

Heck, just go with the IBM SIMMs.  They work.  Besides,
according to this week's MacLeak (MacWeek), Apple will
be supporting the x9 SIMMs for parity checking real soon now.

Ken



Ken Hancock  '90                   | BITNET/UUCP/
Personal Computing Ctr Consultant  |   INTERNET:  isle@eleazar.dartmouth.edu
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER?  I don't get paid enough to worry about disclaimers.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <14031@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mailrus!purdue!bu-cs!dartvax!eleazar.dartmouth.edu!isle

References: <138@nisca.ircc.ohio-state.edu> <1072@starfish.Convergent.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mailrus!purdue!bu-cs!dartvax!eleazar.dartmouth.edu!isle
From: isle@eleazar.dartmouth.edu (Ken Hancock)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: SIMM pricing
Message-ID: <14031@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU>
Date: 22 Jun 89 02:41:25 GMT
References: <138@nisca.ircc.ohio-state.edu> <1072@starfish.Convergent.COM>
Sender: news@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU
Reply-To: isle@eleazar.dartmouth.edu (Ken Hancock)
Distribution: comp.sys.mac
Organization: Personal Computing Center, Dartmouth College
Lines: 14

Reply to Parent Message