Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #5005Re: Left in Dust? (was: Adobe Type Manager)
From: Brandon S. Allbery
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1989 23:37
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1989 23:37
41 lines
3098 bytes
3098 bytes
As quoted from <ALMS.89Sep21122621@brazil.cambridge.apple.com> by alms@cambridge.apple.com (Andrew L. M. Shalit): +--------------- | When you take advantage of the power of new machines, you inevitably | add features that can't be supported on older machines. This is part | of the price of progress. Of course, you should make every effort to | support backward compatibility, and Apple is doing that (much more so | than many other computer companies). But if you want inovation, you | have to admit some degree of obsolesence. +--------------- Everyone is missing what *else* I said on the subject, to wit: I upgraded a XT-clone from the brink of obsolescence to something near the cutting edge. $700 (yes, SEVEN HUNDRED) total. Apple wants $1700 or more for the equivalent of what I paid $620 for in my XT-clone, and a few hundred more for the other $80 of the upgrade (higher resolution graphics). I also remember Apple reps at a local Mac U/G meeting last year saying that System 8.0 would *require* virtual memory. Pluses and SEs will suddenly go the way of the 128K and 512K Macs at that point. At this point, from the sheer economics of the situation it would be better if I unpacked the 386-nee-XT-clone again and packed away the Mac that I just made able to completely replace the PC. Boo, hiss. Of course, the economics of the situation derive from the fact that IBM has plenty of clones, whereas Apple is still pristine -- it still amounts to it being a LOT cheaper to keep one's PC up to date than it is to maintain one's Mac. And, frankly, with the price differential there's a limit to how many people are really going to be interested in buying Macs instead of PCs. If Apple wants to concede the market for "the rest of us" and become a high-end workstation company, fine -- but say so and get it over with, so people can bail out before they're *really* screwed. Of course, we were all screwed by believing Apple's original Mac sales pitches, but hey, that's business, right? Reconsider. ++Brandon -- Brandon S. Allbery, moderator of comp.sources.misc allbery@NCoast.ORG uunet!hal.cwru.edu!ncoast!allbery ncoast!allbery@hal.cwru.edu bsa@telotech.uucp, 161-7070 BALLBERY (MCI), ALLBERY (Delphi), B.ALLBERY (GEnie) Is that enough addresses for you? no? then: allbery@uunet.UU.NET (c.s.misc)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1989Sep21.233740.8727@NCoast.ORG>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!cwjcc!hal!ncoast!allberyReferences:
<15514@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> <1179@adobe.UUCP> <459@amanue.UUCP> <1197@adobe.UUCP> <752@ndcheg.cheg.nd.edu> <1205@adobe.UUCP> <1207@adobe.UUCP> <1989Sep16.030547.10105@NCoast.ORG> <507@sunfs3.camex.uucp> <20020@usc.edu> <ALMS.89Sep21122621@brazil.cambridShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!cwjcc!hal!ncoast!allbery From: allbery@NCoast.ORG (Brandon S. Allbery) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Left in Dust? (was: Adobe Type Manager) Message-ID: <1989Sep21.233740.8727@NCoast.ORG> Date: 21 Sep 89 23:37:40 GMT References: <15514@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> <1179@adobe.UUCP> <459@amanue.UUCP> <1197@adobe.UUCP> <752@ndcheg.cheg.nd.edu> <1205@adobe.UUCP> <1207@adobe.UUCP> <1989Sep16.030547.10105@NCoast.ORG> <507@sunfs3.camex.uucp> <20020@usc.edu> <ALMS.89Sep21122621@brazil.cambrid Reply-To: allbery@ncoast.ORG (Brandon S. Allbery) Followup-To: comp.sys.mac Organization: North Coast Public Access UN*X, Cleveland, OH Lines: 41