Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #5039MacPortable has non-ISO keyboard layout
From: Ian Feldman
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 1989 11:21
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 1989 11:21
49 lines
3027 bytes
3027 bytes
These questions are specifically addressed to the people from Apple, though I'd also like to hear others' opinion on the same subject. Background: Judging from the pictures of the MacPortable on the cover of BYTE, October issue, its keyboard layout differs from that of a standard ADB one - as well as from the recommended ISO standard. The second command key to the right of the space bar seems to be gone, possibly replaced by a second option-key (couldn't read the legend properly) that, alas, has been shrunk in size from 1.5 to 1-key-width module - both of them in fact. The current arrow-key layout of non-extended keyboards with horizontal placement for the left and right-direction keys, vertical for the up/ down-movement ones has been replaced by a single line of four arrow keys in a row, below the (now larger) rightmost shift key. While these changes from IMHO the present well-functioning ADB key layout might (*only*) take some time to get used to for someone that is migrating portable-wards I fail to see the justification for moving the <key between leftmost shift and Z> out to a position between the (now the only one) command key and the space bar. Besides being a violation of the recommended ISO keyboard layout standard that makes it harder to use the MacPortable in multi-hardware environments it simply "gets in the way" of touch-accessing (ie, no peeking) there residing option and command keys. The <ctrl> key seems also to have been moved from the present (on my Swedish SE keyboard) position in the lower left corner up to a level above the shift key, switching positions with the caps-lock key. Though the latter's relative importance (based on frequency of usage) in no way matches its normal, prime position nor the physical size - usually larger than the shift key - its replacement is another needlessly reintroduced step backwards as far as I am concerned. Besides that, the <ctrl> key's ISO-defined, usual placement at the very physically-felt boundary of the keyboard rectangle makes it more easily accessible than from the new position above the left shift key. Question: Is the keyboard on the BYTE cover just an early, pre-production, model or is it a conscious try by Apple to redefine the present, by-and- large ISO-compliant ADB keyboard layout? -- ---- ------ ianf@nada.kth.se/ @sekth.bitnet/ uunet!nada.kth.se!ianf ---- --
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1738@draken.nada.kth.se>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!sunic!kth!draken!ianfShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!sunic!kth!draken!ianf
From: ianf@nada.kth.se (Ian Feldman)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: MacPortable has non-ISO keyboard layout
Summary: I want the second command key back
and the control in the usual lower-left-corner position
Keywords: ADB keyboard ISO standard option doubble command keys
Message-ID: <1738@draken.nada.kth.se>
Date: 22 Sep 89 11:21:44 GMT
Reply-To: ianf@nada.kth.se (Ian Feldman)
Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Lines: 48