🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #5063

Re: Parity vs. non-Parity RAM in the Mac IIci

#5063
From: Chuq Von Rospach
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 1989 16:41
12 lines
849 bytes
>Gee ... I thought apples (Macs) didn't have parity circuitry built in
>to them.  Parity mem in a Mac is just wasted!? 

The new Mac IIci supports parity as an option. It is currently the only Mac
that has parity support.

-- 

Chuq Von Rospach <+> Editor,OtherRealms <+> Member SFWA/ASFA
chuq@apple.com <+> CI$: 73317,635 <+> [This is myself speaking. I am not Appl
Segmentation Fault. Core dumped.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <34960@apple.Apple.COM>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!chuq
References: <0xe23@deimos.cis.ksu.edu> <34935@apple.Apple.COM> <863@east.East.Sun.COM>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!chuq
From: chuq@Apple.COM (Chuq Von Rospach)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Parity vs. non-Parity RAM in the Mac IIci
Message-ID: <34960@apple.Apple.COM>
Date: 22 Sep 89 16:41:02 GMT
References: <0xe23@deimos.cis.ksu.edu> <34935@apple.Apple.COM> <863@east.East.Sun.COM>
Organization: Life is just a Fantasy novel played for keeps
Lines: 12