🚀 go-pugleaf

As quoted from <4312@internal.Apple.COM> by rmh@apple.com (Rick Holzgrafe):
+---------------
| I thought that "the computer for the rest of us" meant it was easy for my 
| old Auntie Phoebe to use a Mac: you don't have to be a techno-geek (like 
| me :-) to understand it. I never thought it meant that a Macintosh was 
| cheap (um, "inexpensive"). Since when was the Mac ever cheap?
+---------------

Tell me, was your old Auntie Phoebe rich, too?  At the time, I accepted that
the Mac was expensive:  it was, quite simply, more advanced than anything
available at a lower price.

But in my posting that started this thread, my complaint was that I CAN NOW
GET THE EQUIVALENT TECHNOLOGY FOR LESS from others.  It's not as nice, but
what makes it nice -- the software -- is not the expensive part.  Nobody at
Apple has yet addressed my original complaint; should I conclude that Apple
has conceded the point?

++Brandon
-- 
Brandon S. Allbery, moderator of comp.sources.misc	     allbery@NCoast.ORG
uunet!hal.cwru.edu!ncoast!allbery		    ncoast!allbery@hal.cwru.edu
bsa@telotech.uucp, 161-7070 BALLBERY (MCI), ALLBERY (Delphi), B.ALLBERY (GEnie)
Is that enough addresses for you?   no?   then: allbery@uunet.UU.NET (c.s.misc)