Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #5124Re: Parity checking
From: Jay Finger
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 1989 06:36
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 1989 06:36
9 lines
1001 bytes
1001 bytes
My comment that parity increased the likelihood of a memory error by 9/8
was wrong (a small case of brain-lock on my part). It's really only
12.5%.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jay Finger (214) 298-5915 |If all you do is treat symptoms, you'll
UUCP: {ames, mit-eddie}!attctc!torch|continue to see more symptoms forever.
DOMAIN: ames!torch@attctc.dallas.tx.us| -- Tom van Vleck
==============================================================================
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9452@attctc.Dallas.TX.US>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!ginosko!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!sun-barr!texsun!pollux!attctc!torchReferences:
<9451@attctc.Dallas.TX.US>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!ginosko!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!sun-barr!texsun!pollux!attctc!torch From: torch@attctc.Dallas.TX.US (Jay Finger) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Parity checking Summary: 12% increase, not 112%. Keywords: parity IIci Message-ID: <9452@attctc.Dallas.TX.US> Date: 23 Sep 89 06:36:29 GMT References: <9451@attctc.Dallas.TX.US> Distribution: na Organization: The Unix(R) Connection, Dallas, Texas Lines: 9