Re: LSC vs THINK C

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #6093

#6093

From: Rich Siegel
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 1989 12:36

25 lines
1094 bytes

In article <1712@jolnet.ORPK.IL.US> jnoh@jolnet.ORPK.IL.US (Jay Noh) writes:
>

	There's no difference; they're the same. LightspeedC became THINK C
because the laywers at Lightspeed, Inc. (makers of the Lightspeed Color
Layout System) wanted it that way. :-(

		--RIch

>Please post or E-mail responses, thanks.
>
>Jay


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Rich Siegel
 Staff Software Developer
 Symantec Corporation, Language Products Group
 Internet: siegel@endor.harvard.edu
 UUCP: ..harvard!endor!siegel

"There is no personal problem which cannot be solved by sufficient
application of high explosives."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2811@husc6.harvard.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!husc6!endor!siegel

References: <1712@jolnet.ORPK.IL.US>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!husc6!endor!siegel
From: siegel@endor.harvard.edu (Rich Siegel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: LSC vs THINK C
Keywords: C compiler
Message-ID: <2811@husc6.harvard.edu>
Date: 10 Oct 89 12:36:51 GMT
References: <1712@jolnet.ORPK.IL.US>
Sender: news@husc6.harvard.edu
Reply-To: siegel@endor.UUCP (Rich Siegel)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Symantec Language Products Group
Lines: 25

Reply to Parent Message