Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #6228Re: Apple to Fix Quantum Drive Failures
From: NightMeower
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 1989 13:10
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 1989 13:10
24 lines
1484 bytes
1484 bytes
Up to this point in time, my Quantum 40 has worked fine but that of course does not mean that it will continue to do so (Knock on wood). All of this discussion has only said that there are some problems with certain Quantums 40s or 80s. Which ones are at risk? It would be extremely beneficial (sp?) if those people that have had real problems with their Quantums post the serial numbers. That way we could get an idea of which drives have the largest potential for disastor at a later time and we could then send them in for the "fix". You can bet Apple and Quantum aren't going to freely give this information out considering how long it took to finally be recognized as a problem. After this posting, I am certain to have lots of friends at Apple ;-) Kevin -- =========================================================================== Kevin S. Wiechmann arpa: wiechman@rutgers.rutgers.edu This is only a test... for the next sixty seconds...
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Oct.12.09.10.00.1989.9026@athos.rutgers.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!rutgers!aramis.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!wiechmanReferences:
<957@bridge2.ESD.3Com.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!rutgers!aramis.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!wiechman From: wiechman@athos.rutgers.edu (NightMeower) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.mac.programmer Subject: Re: Apple to Fix Quantum Drive Failures Keywords: Apple,Quantum,FIX,REFUND! Message-ID: <Oct.12.09.10.00.1989.9026@athos.rutgers.edu> Date: 12 Oct 89 13:10:01 GMT References: <957@bridge2.ESD.3Com.COM> Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 24