Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #6306Re: Microsoft Mail 2.0
From: Chuq Von Rospach
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 1989 22:47
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 1989 22:47
19 lines
1235 bytes
1235 bytes
> Ok Netland, I need some opinions about Microsoft Mail 2.0. Does it work?
Well, we're using it here. I'm whelmed. We're still running a (late) beta
version, it works pretty well, but the feature set and operations are
kludgey. If I were just setting up an e-mail network, I'd go with Quickmail
instead (as is various other parts of Apple).
It's not a bad product. It works. It's a good, safe business decision type
piece of software. Quickmail has a lot more functionality and better (& more
intuitive) bells and whistles.
--
Chuq Von Rospach <+> Editor,OtherRealms <+> Member SFWA/ASFA
chuq@apple.com <+> CI$: 73317,635 <+> [This is myself speaking]
Anyone who thinks that the argument over {sci,rec}.fishies is about
group names doesn't understand the system.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<35712@apple.Apple.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!chuqReferences:
<566@zip.eecs.umich.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!chuq From: chuq@Apple.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,comp.protocols.appletalk Subject: Re: Microsoft Mail 2.0 Keywords: Mail, email Message-ID: <35712@apple.Apple.COM> Date: 16 Oct 89 22:47:03 GMT References: <566@zip.eecs.umich.edu> Organization: Life is just a Fantasy novel played for keeps Lines: 19