Re: Bitsmoothing & NeXT Laserwriters fo

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #6722

#6722

From: gillies
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 1989 00:41

9 lines
833 bytes

I was under the impression that bitsmoothing was a 68000
assembly-language hack on the laserwriters ONLY, and that it is
theoretically impossible to do with the postscript language.


Don Gillies, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Illinois
1304 W. Springfield, Urbana, Ill 61801      
ARPA: gillies@cs.uiuc.edu   UUCP: {uunet,harvard}!uiucdcs!gillies

Technical Details

Message-ID: <126900078@p.cs.uiuc.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!m.cs.uiuc.edu!p.cs.uiuc.edu!gillies

References: <220004@<1989Oct17>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!m.cs.uiuc.edu!p.cs.uiuc.edu!gillies
From: gillies@p.cs.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Bitsmoothing & NeXT Laserwriters fo
Message-ID: <126900078@p.cs.uiuc.edu>
Date: 20 Oct 89 00:41:06 GMT
References: <220004@<1989Oct17>
Lines: 9
Nf-ID: #R:<1989Oct17:220004:p.cs.uiuc.edu:126900078:000:357
Nf-From: p.cs.uiuc.edu!gillies    Oct 18 19:06:00 1989

Reply to Parent Message