Re: SafeEject and 6.0.4

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #7092

#7092

From: James Osborne
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1989 20:49

16 lines
1275 bytes

In article <9989@pucc.Princeton.EDU> FTWILSON@pucc.Princeton.EDU writes:
>      It would appear that you should not use SafeEject with 6.0.4.
>System 6.0.4 DOES move the head to the 79th (I think) track before
>ejection of the disk, which, as I understand it, is the function of
>SafeEject. (PS this is for FDHDs ONLY)
>
>Todd Wilson
>std disclaimer

  Wait a minute! I thought the whole problem was in the 800K drives and
NOT the FDHDs!!!!
--
----------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER:  Any opinions expressed are not those of my employer, even at such
             time they may be that of my employer. Nor are they my own.
UUCP/Internet/ARPA/(anything)  James.Osborne@mac.Dartmouth.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <16358@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!purdue!bu-cs!dartvax!eleazar.dartmouth.edu!xerox

References: <4970@wpi.wpi.edu> <4979@wpi.wpi.edu> <16315@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> <9989@pucc.Princeton.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!purdue!bu-cs!dartvax!eleazar.dartmouth.edu!xerox
From: xerox@eleazar.dartmouth.edu (James Osborne)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: SafeEject and 6.0.4
Message-ID: <16358@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU>
Date: 25 Oct 89 20:49:57 GMT
References: <4970@wpi.wpi.edu> <4979@wpi.wpi.edu> <16315@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> <9989@pucc.Princeton.EDU>
Sender: news@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU
Reply-To: xerox@eleazar.dartmouth.edu (James Osborne)
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
Lines: 16

Reply to Parent Message