Re: Sony vs. Quantum drives in SE/30

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #7127

#7127

From: IEEE group account
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 1989 03:07

11 lines
844 bytes

In article <1989Oct24.202315.29570@hellgate.utah.edu> t-jacobs@cs.utah.edu (Tony Jacobs) writes:
>>this mean that I am lucky, or are the Quantum drives theoretically superior
>>to the Sonys?
>
>The Quantum is noticably faster.

...when they're not stuck :)

Fred Hollander

SMU is not responsible for this posting, I am.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <15976@pollux.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!pollux!smu!ieee

References: <16312@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> <1989Oct24.202315.29570@hellgate.utah.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!pollux!smu!ieee
From: ieee@smu.uucp (IEEE group account)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Sony vs. Quantum drives in SE/30
Message-ID: <15976@pollux.UUCP>
Date: 26 Oct 89 03:07:32 GMT
References: <16312@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> <1989Oct24.202315.29570@hellgate.utah.edu>
Sender: news@pollux.UUCP
Reply-To: ieee@smu.UUCP (IEEE group account)
Organization: Southern Methodist University, CSE Dept. Dallas, TX
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message