Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #7731Re: summary/comparision of SE/30 and IIcx, IIx and IIcx, SE/30 and IIx
From: John Tsang
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1989 13:59
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1989 13:59
79 lines
3853 bytes
3853 bytes
Expires:
References: <1218@corpane.UUCP>
Sender:
Reply-To: jgt@uhccux.UUCP (John Tsang)
Followup-To: comp.sys.mac
Distribution:
Organization: University of Hawaii
Keywords: SE, SE/30, II, IIx, IIcx, IIci, portable; CPU, resolution, speed, port
s, expansion, performance, reliability, prices, Mac Portrait Monitor, Macintosh
In article <1218@corpane.UUCP> sparks@corpane.UUCP (John Sparks) writes:
>I may be getting to work with a Mac IIcx soon. I presently do not know
>
>Could someone give me a run down on the features of the Mac IIcx?
>peripherals, etc.
1. I have the same _urgent_ problem too in trying to determine which one to
upgrade from my SE currently being used. While money is not extremely
important -- not a critical factor to prevent getting good performance
and speed -- I don't want to spend more than $5000 for a system with
an (at least) full-page (at least) B/W -- preferably monochrome monitor
40 MB (external) hard disk: preferably the Quantum faster drive,
such as, MicroTech Nova and Jasmine;
high density disk drive -- if possible 2 internal;
101 keyboard or the Mac extended keyboard;
more than 1 MB of RAM to use Multifinder (or Switcher) decently;
and,
the Imagewriter LQ, or, a third party Mac/Imagewriter comparable
(with the necessary software and cable to link them) -- if budget allows,
but not essential, as I still have the IW.
Could this be possible?
Any suggestion, if not?
Any suggestion on which mail order company, brand of third party
hardware, ..... to buy -- and to avoid?
2. Thus, I'm deciding on which newer model of Mac to buy:
II, SE/30, IIx, IIcx or even the IIci -- and the portable is not excluded
for consideration.
Therefore, I need comparision, evaluation and summary of:
IIx and IIcx -- only smaller?
SE/30 and IIcx -- if the IIcx is only smaller than the IIx;
SE/30 and IIx -- if the IIx is better and more powerful than the IIcx.
Finally isn't it not necessary to get the IIci yet, while it's
so expensive and new -- unless for power user, as a server, .....?
p.s. Do you know which issue of MacWorld or MacUser (or other magazines)
has compared these
models: the SE, SE/30, II, IIx, IIcx, and the IIci?
3. SE/30 should be the highest possible choice financially, because
the school price is only about $2800
+ Mac Portrait Monitor $831
+ Mac II Porttrait Video Card (same for SE/30 ?!) $450
+ hard disk $600
+ Mac 101 keyboard $140
= $4821
But, can the SE connect to an external 2-page or full-page
monitor, which needs a card in the only slot of the SE, while it
can still be put 4 MB of RAM?
4. Subsequently, is the Mac Portrait Monitor less expensive
than the third party -- for the above price -- with the necessary
expansion card and RAM to drive the screen update faster?
Any (type of) advice is appreciated. Thanks!
*****
However, I prefer E-mail, and will post a summary later, if any other
people want know the same topic.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5421@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!genbank!ames!uhccux!jgtShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!genbank!ames!uhccux!jgt From: jgt@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu (John Tsang) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.mac.hardware,aus.mac,misc.consumers Subject: Re: summary/comparision of SE/30 and IIcx, IIx and IIcx, SE/30 and IIx Summary: I want to choose to upgrade from SE to SE/30, IIcx, or IIci -- if not t Message-ID: <5421@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu> Date: 11 Nov 89 13:59:41 GMT Organization: University of Hawaii Lines: 79