Re: Mac 128s and 512s

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #7814

#7814

From: Ken Mcleod
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 1989 12:32

12 lines
1076 bytes

AS you describe the situation, there is no harm in using an old 128 or
512.  However, the person purchasing one of these machines should
definitely keep in mind that the upgrade path is expensive.  If there is
no
intention to upgrade but purchase a more up to date systme when finances
are available, then what's the concern?  Either machine (particularly the
512) with Word 1.05 beats the hell out of a typewrtier.

--  
Ken Mcleod via cmhGate - Net 226 fido<=>uucp gateway Col, OH
UUCP: ...!osu-cis!n8emr!cmhgate!102!823!Ken.Mcleod
INET: Ken.Mcleod@f823.n102.z1.FIDONET.ORG

Technical Details

Message-ID: <29693.2560C606@cmhgate.FIDONET.ORG>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!shadooby!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!n8emr!cmhgate!f823.n102.z1.FIDONET.ORG!Ken.Mcleod

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!shadooby!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!n8emr!cmhgate!f823.n102.z1.FIDONET.ORG!Ken.Mcleod
From: Ken.Mcleod@f823.n102.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Ken Mcleod)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Mac 128s and 512s
Message-ID: <29693.2560C606@cmhgate.FIDONET.ORG>
Date: 11 Nov 89 12:32:02 GMT
Sender: ufgate@cmhgate.FIDONET.ORG (newsout1.26)
Organization: FidoNet node 1:102/823 - The Bear's Lair, Van Nuys CA
Lines: 12