Re: Why is Excel 2.2 is a magnitude (or two) slower than Excel 1.5

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #7816

#7816

From: David Phillip Oster
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 1989 09:47

3 lines
800 bytes

Note the title of this post. Guys, an order of magnitude is a factor of
10. Two orders of magnitude is a factor of 100. A factor of two is not an
order of magnitude (or two).

Technical Details

Message-ID: <32578@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!shadooby!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!ucsd!ucbvax!dewey.soe.berkeley.edu!oster

References: <7940@ditmela.oz> <4016@ur-cc.UUCP> <14211@jumbo.dec.com> <7990@ditmela.oz>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!shadooby!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!ucsd!ucbvax!dewey.soe.berkeley.edu!oster
From: oster@dewey.soe.berkeley.edu (David Phillip Oster)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Why is Excel 2.2 is a magnitude (or two) slower than Excel 1.5
Message-ID: <32578@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: 15 Nov 89 09:47:02 GMT
References: <7940@ditmela.oz> <4016@ur-cc.UUCP> <14211@jumbo.dec.com> <7990@ditmela.oz>
Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: oster@dewey.soe.berkeley.edu.UUCP (David Phillip Oster)
Organization: School of Education, UC-Berkeley
Lines: 3

Reply to Parent Message