Re: White Knight throughput

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #8497

#8497

From: Norman Goodger
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1989 19:59

17 lines
1128 bytes

In article <7116@pt.cs.cmu.edu> pane@cat.cmu.edu (John Pane) writes:
>
>Has anybody evaluated White Knight at high baud rates (>9600)?  I am using
>Red Ryder 10.3 at 19.2 Kbaud, and screen display is a major bottleneck.
>Does White Knight do any better?

The throughput of White knight is significantly faster than 10.3. It
keeps up at 9600 without problems, at 19.2 there maybe some lag, course
this depends somewhat on how fast your Mac is (Plus,Se,II,CX,CI) and
if you are using color on color machines?

-- 
Norm Goodger				SysOp - MacInfo BBS @415-795-8862
3Com Corp.				Co-SysOp FreeSoft RT - GEnie.
Enterprise Systems Division             (I disclaim anything and everything)
UUCP: {3comvax,auspex,sun}!bridge2!ngg  Internet: ngg@bridge2.ESD.3Com.COM

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1113@bridge2.ESD.3Com.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!jarthur!bridge2!ngg

References: <7116@pt.cs.cmu.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!jarthur!bridge2!ngg
From: ngg@bridge2.ESD.3Com.COM (Norman Goodger)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: White Knight throughput
Message-ID: <1113@bridge2.ESD.3Com.COM>
Date: 28 Nov 89 19:59:43 GMT
References: <7116@pt.cs.cmu.edu>
Organization: 3Com Corp., Mt. View, CA
Lines: 17

Reply to Parent Message