🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #8520

Re: Gatorbox vs. Fastpath 4: which is better?

#8520
From: Jeffrey M White
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1989 03:03
33 lines
2444 bytes
In article <4163@cayman.COM> chris@cayman.COM (Chris North) writes:
>> 
>> The software that implements the AppleShare - NFS function has been
>> unbundled (as of this summer sometime). I suspect the prices you
>> are comparing do not include the cost of this software. I don't have
>> a recent price list in front of me; I recall it to be about $1800.
>
>  Yes, the GatorBox software has been unbundled.  You can now buy a vanilla
>GatorBox with the GatorSystem software for $2795.  This has essentially the
>same functionality as a Fastpath.  In addition to that you can purchase the
>GatorShare software which enables you to mount NFS volumes as Appleshare 
>volumes for $1995.

  Maybe it's me, but I'm confused about the prices given.  It seems from 
the followup given here (from someone at Cayman) that a Gatorbox with the
NFS software is now $2795+$1995 = $4790.  Is this right!!!  I thought 
before the unbundling the price was in the $3000-$3500.  This is a big
jump.  Neither of the numbers given seem to have anything to do with the
original poster's $1800 price.  What's the scoop?

					Jeff White
					University of Pennsylvania
					jeff@eniac.seas.upenn.edu

PS - I don't want to start any arguements on whether commercail postings
     belong here, but since there aren't that many gateways available, and
     a lot of the people in comp.protocols.appletalk seem pretty interested
     in term, I wouldn't mind seeing more postings directly from Kinetics
     (oops, that's Novell now) or Cayman, describing any new features,
     current prices, upgrade info (Phase II, for example).  I don't always
     have access to a MacWeek to get the latest information, and I think 
     info right from the sources would cut down on some of the postings and
     subsequent followups from people looking for such information.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <17415@netnews.upenn.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!tank!eecae!netnews.upenn.edu!eniac.seas.upenn.edu!jeff
References: <29508@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <5456@ncar.ucar.edu> <4163@cayman.COM>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!tank!eecae!netnews.upenn.edu!eniac.seas.upenn.edu!jeff
From: jeff@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Jeffrey M White)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Gatorbox vs. Fastpath 4: which is better?
Message-ID: <17415@netnews.upenn.edu>
Date: 29 Nov 89 03:03:40 GMT
References: <29508@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <5456@ncar.ucar.edu> <4163@cayman.COM>
Sender: news@netnews.upenn.edu
Reply-To: jeff@eniac.seas.upenn.edu.UUCP (Jeffrey M White)
Organization: University of Pennsylvania
Lines: 33