🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1886@accuvax.nwu.edu> jln@accuvax.nwu.edu (John Norstad) writes:
>A new Macintosh virus named "WDEF" has been discovered in Belgium,
>at Northwestern University, and at the University of Texas.
>
>The WDEF virus infects the invisible "Desktop" files used by the
>Finder.  Every Macintosh disk has one of these files (hard drives
>and floppies).  The virus spreads from Desktop file to Desktop
>file, but it does not infect applications, data files, or system
>files.
>
> ...
>
>You do not have to run a program for the virus to spread.

Then how *does* it spread?

I've learned not to get worried at the sight of what might be a bad
virus.  (Just look at the DataCrime virus in the IBM PC that was
supposed to wipe hard drives clean on Columbus Day - nothing big ever
came of that, but people panicked anyway.)

Now this alleged WDEF virus comes along.  First of all, how can it
possibly do any damage from the DeskTop file?  The DeskTop is data
only - it is not run.  The only way it could do damage is by
persuading the Finder to go on a rampage of some sort.  This would be
analogous to a book that made everyone who read it immediately go out
and kill someone without realizing it - not highly likely.

Secondly, so what if the WDEF *is* a virus?  What program would look
for a WDEF in the DeskTop file?  A WDEF is a Window DEFinition
resource (providing those funky NeXT-style window INITs, for example.)
The DeskTop is used primarily for icons and other miscellaneous Finder
information.  The Finder gets its WDEF resources from the System.  If
the Finder were to check every resource in the DeskTop file just to
make sure it didn't need any of them, it would run awfully slowly.
Therefore, it doesn't search for anything it doesn't need - and it
certainly doesn't need WDEF's from the DeskTop, and even if it did, it
certainly wouldn't switch from interpreting them as data for drawing
windows to data for messing with files.

Thirdly, I'd like to remind everyone that there have been three
postings before this one about the virus.  The first announced it.
The second followed impressively quickly, and introduced 'Eradicator!'
to fix it.  The third was a post from someone at Stanford who *thinks*
he has the virus, and has also downloaded 'Eradicator!' to fix it.

Now, call me a doubting Thomas, but I find it highly unusual that (a)
someone could whip up a patch that quickly after the virus was
discovered, (b) the virus could spread that quickly from the three
source locations (hmm...) to Stanford, and (c) that the virus appeared
at Stanford at around the same time that 'Eradicator!' was introduced
there.  (The posted didn't say whether he downloaded 'Eradicator!'
after he suspected the virus, or if he just downloaded the program to
be safe and only later found traces of funny business.)

Also, if the virus only affects the DeskTop file and copies itself,
with no other effect on the use (as the original annoucement stated),
how did the Stanford folks notice it?  Does everyone at Stanford have
a IIci?  (I only rarely check the resources in my DeskTop file just for
the heck of it.  ;-)

I'm not blaming anyone for anything.  I'm just stating that the events
thus far surrounding the 'virus' have been somewhat questionable.

I will wait for more information before I set up my defenses against
the WDEF virus.

     << Brian >>

-- 
| Brian S. Kendig      ^ Macintosh |  /\   _||_ | bskendig                   |
| Computer Engineering |\ Thought  | /__\  \  / | @phoenix.Princeton.EDU     |
| Princeton University | \ Police  |  ||    \/  | @PUCC.BITNET               |
| Systems Engineering, NASA Space Station Freedom / General Electric WP3     |