Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #20710Re: Smart Alarms Incessant Beeping (Yet Again)
From: Simon Evans
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1987 07:15
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1987 07:15
64 lines
3351 bytes
3351 bytes
(I have not seen any postings on this subject other than those mentioned
here as my host has been down for a week and no others have arrived. I
will reply to all future psotings by mail. (This is a repost of an
article I sent yesterday with a mangled disclaimer that said the opposite
of what I meant))
Recently, lriggins@afit-ab.arpa (L. Maurice Riggins) in reply to my
message said-
| Com'on, Smart Alarms is great! Brian's patch
| made it better. You could make it better yet! How?
| Fix the volume level problem and add or recommend SpaceWarp F-key or
| some other blanker which shuts Smart Alarms up like you said in your
| article.
The volume level problem was fixed in June 87 (within a day or
so of the first complaint we had about this behaviour - Yes, we
do listen to suggestions and bug reports) and so Smart Alarms now
respects the control panel volume setting always (from version 2.581
I think).
Maybe screen blankers won't be necessary - see below - but we
will suggest to Imagine that they recommend an appropriate screen blanker;
| Your reply didn't address the problem and perhaps made a few folks
| wonder why they should "pay" for user-supported software...not even a
| "Gee, we'll look at that".
Well, "Gee, we'll look at that", and will look seriously at any
problems reported. As I said, the volume level problem
is fixed, and I will campaign for a installation *option* to
disable incessant beeping and so obviate the need for a screen blanker,
but its not my program so I can't make any promises...
Christopher Chow said -
| BTW, I think the correct behavior for SA
| is to beep through a screen saver -- that way if the screen is
| dimmed because you've been idle you won't miss an appointment.
| However, the volume set on the control panel should be obeyed
| *** at all times ***.
Well, we already comply with your second request. The first is
satisfied for almost all screen savers already, as many people
have pointed out.
( BTW I don't know what one of the writers meant by
"perhaps made a few folks wonder why they should 'pay' for
user-supported software" - Smart Alarms is a copyright product and
not "user-supported software" in the sense of shareware etc.
)
Thank you all for your patience and suggestions in this. Again,
"Gee, we'll look at that" any time you ask !!
Disclaimer: Although I work for JAM, I receive *NO* financial benefits,
directly or indirectly, from Smart Alarms. OK?
Simon Evans ISD: +61 2 953-7031 or +61 2 799-1888
JAM Software Pty Ltd STD: (02) 953-7031 or (02) 799-1888
27A Nowranie Street ACS: sce@runx.ips.oz
Summer Hill NSW 2130 UUCP: seismo!munnari!runx.ips.oz!sce
AUSTRALIA ARPA: munnari!runx.ips.oz!sce@SEISMO
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1171@runx.ips.oz>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!munnari!otc!metro!ipso!runx!sceShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!munnari!otc!metro!ipso!runx!sce From: sce@runx.ips.oz (Simon Evans) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Smart Alarms Incessant Beeping (Yet Again) Message-ID: <1171@runx.ips.oz> Date: Fri, 23-Oct-87 02:15:24 EST Article-I.D.: runx.1171 Posted: Fri Oct 23 02:15:24 1987 Date-Received: Mon, 26-Oct-87 00:30:33 EST Organization: RUNX Un*x Timeshare. Sydney, Australia. Lines: 63