Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #1555TLSC vs MPW C :Savage
From: rif_xu
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 1989 13:01
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 1989 13:01
10 lines
703 bytes
703 bytes
I have compiled the standard Byte benchmark Savage using Think's LSC 3.01p4 on a MacII. I used the Math881lib and the std881lib and had the flags for '881 and '020 code generation set. It ran in 6 s. A version compiled in MPW C 2.02 ran in 3.3 s. Can anyone tell me why LSC generates so slow (MPW C is nearly twice as fast) code ? S Ruschkowski
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1629@eds.ericsson.se>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!kth!sunic!ericom!tnetxa.ericsson.se!eds.ericsson.se!rif_xuShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!kth!sunic!ericom!tnetxa.ericsson.se!eds.ericsson.se!rif_xu From: rif_xu@eds.ericsson.se Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: TLSC vs MPW C :Savage Message-ID: <1629@eds.ericsson.se> Date: 18 Jul 89 13:01:27 GMT Lines: 10