Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #4689Re: Adobe Type Manager
From: Charles C. Allen
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 1989 02:15
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 1989 02:15
8 lines
921 bytes
921 bytes
How does ATM do with "standard" sizes on an ImageWriter compared to the 2x bitmapped versions of fonts like Times, Helvetica, Bookman, Palatino, etc. (Adobe and Apple versions)? I've never been pleased with the IW output for those fonts in the 9-12 point size, where a proper 2x bitmapped version usually exists. Am I just being too hard on my poor little IW, or can ATM do better? Charles Allen cca@newton.physics.purdue.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2562@pur-phy>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!pur-ee!pur-phy!ccaReferences:
<15514@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> <1179@adobe.UUCP> <459@amanue.UUCP> <767@ndcheg.cheg.nd.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!pur-ee!pur-phy!cca From: cca@pur-phy (Charles C. Allen) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Adobe Type Manager Summary: 9-12 point on IW compared to bitmapped versions? Message-ID: <2562@pur-phy> Date: 17 Sep 89 02:15:30 GMT References: <15514@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> <1179@adobe.UUCP> <459@amanue.UUCP> <767@ndcheg.cheg.nd.edu> Organization: Purdue Univ. Phys Dept, W.Lafayette, IN Lines: 8