Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #15971why not A/UX on Mac SE?
From: Gustav
Date: Tue, 05 May 1987 11:54
Date: Tue, 05 May 1987 11:54
18 lines
1315 bytes
1315 bytes
Mac II with it's implementation of UNIX is sure going
to be a very fine system. But there is one draw back: it's
going to be rather difficult to move it around. A big box, a
separate monitor... in this respect the old Mac was a neat
and practical solution.
An alternative to A/UX on Mac II might be A/UX plus an
appropriate 68020 and MMU card for Mac SE. Mac SE can take
in one card - why not this one? This type of enhancement is
so obvious and natural that if Apple is not going to come up
with it, almost certainly someone else will.
So, please, if you know something about it already, let
me know. I may happen to be your first customer.
ARPA : gustav%swanee.oz@seismo.css.gov
UUCP : ...!{seismo,mcvax,ucb-vision,uks}!munnari!swanee.oz!gustav
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<325@swanee.OZ>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!munnari!otc!metro!basser!wacsvax!swanee!gustavShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!munnari!otc!metro!basser!wacsvax!swanee!gustav From: gustav@swanee.OZ (Gustav) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: why not A/UX on Mac SE? Message-ID: <325@swanee.OZ> Date: Tue, 5-May-87 07:54:51 EDT Article-I.D.: swanee.325 Posted: Tue May 5 07:54:51 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 9-May-87 01:12:55 EDT Organization: El. & El. Eng., Uni. of Western Australia Lines: 18 Keywords: UNIX, Mac SE, A/UX, 68020