Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #28636Re: The FullWrite 1 Meg controversy
From: Brian McElhinney
Date: Fri, 27 May 1988 21:43
Date: Fri, 27 May 1988 21:43
17 lines
1202 bytes
1202 bytes
In article <2914@polyslo.UUCP> dorourke@polyslo.UUCP (David O'Rourke) writes: > The rest of the program is very very good, but the drawing enviroment > might be a good canidate for axing. No no no! If you have complicated drawings in a big document, the last thing you want to do is cut & paste for every change. [Ok, I'm biased; I always thought cut & paste was a pain, electronic or not.] Actually, I would assume (silly me) that the drawing environment segmented out nicely, so it wouldn't help very much to remove it. Now if it could only do "smart" drawings ala Design... Who knows, a year from now FullWrite might be the first to break the 2 Mb barrier. Brian McElhinney mce@tc.fluke.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3904@fluke.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!husc6!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!fluke!mceReferences:
<2120@ur-tut.UUCP> <2914@polyslo.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!husc6!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!fluke!mce From: mce@tc.fluke.COM (Brian McElhinney) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: The FullWrite 1 Meg controversy Keywords: FullWrite Message-ID: <3904@fluke.COM> Date: 27 May 88 21:43:34 GMT References: <2120@ur-tut.UUCP> <2914@polyslo.UUCP> Sender: news@tc.fluke.COM Distribution: na Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc., Everett, WA Lines: 17