Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #30135Yawn ! Not more Emacs discussion...
From: sqrkl
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 1988 12:19
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 1988 12:19
26 lines
1729 bytes
1729 bytes
In article <14243@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU>,
kennel@minnie.cognet.ucla.edu (Matthew Kennel) writes:
>
> I quote from the INSTALL file of our gnu emacs distribution:
[lots of Emacs twaddle deleted]
I think the designers of Emacs are the ones who are brain-damaged.
Leaving aside the fact that their editor is one big joke to those who
like using PROPER editors, XON-XOFF is now the de facto standard for
flow control and any terminal (or emulator) not supporting XON-XOFF
should NOT be used.
I make no guarantees about my terminal emulator being able to handle
output at 9600 baud without XON/XOFF because I have assumed that people
are intelligent to know that even a true VT100 can't keep up at that
sort of speed (esp. with smooth scrolling on !).
Richard K. Lloyd, ****** This is a VAX 11/780 running VAX/VMS V4.5 ******
Computer Science Dept., * JANET : SQRKL@UK.AC.LIV.CSVAX *
Liverpool University, * UUCP : {backbone}!mcvax!ukc!mupsy!liv-cs!SQRKL *
Merseyside, England, * Internet : SQRKL%csvax.liv.ac.uk@cunyvm.cuny.edu *
Great Britain. *******************************************************
"My opinions and those of the University of Liverpool are completely unrelated,
so I'M THE CULPRIT if you feel offended by the above message - I just can't
help moaning about Atari STs, PCs or clones, U**X, C, IBM mainframes, the list
is endless..."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4197@csvax.liv.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!ukc!mupsy!liv-cs!sqrklShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!ukc!mupsy!liv-cs!sqrkl From: sqrkl@csvax.liv.ac.uk Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Yawn ! Not more Emacs discussion... Message-ID: <4197@csvax.liv.ac.uk> Date: 13 Jul 88 12:19:45 GMT Lines: 26 Organisation: Computer Science CSVAX (VAX1), Liverpool University