Re: Mac C Compilers, Benchmarks, Stupidity

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #18016

#18016

From: David S. Comay
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1987 17:37

5 lines
899 bytes

the one thing i remember from the byte article is that the binaries
they used on the mac // were the same ones they used on the mac plus.
namely, they contained strictly 68000 instructions.

dsc

Technical Details

Message-ID: <46745@seismo.CSS.GOV>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!seismo!izimbra!dsc

References: <3560@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!seismo!izimbra!dsc
From: dsc@izimbra.CSS.GOV (David S. Comay)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Mac C Compilers, Benchmarks, Stupidity
Message-ID: <46745@seismo.CSS.GOV>
Date: Tue, 11-Aug-87 13:37:20 EDT
Article-I.D.: seismo.46745
Posted: Tue Aug 11 13:37:20 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 13-Aug-87 03:21:17 EDT
References: <3560@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu>
Sender: usenet@seismo.CSS.GOV
Distribution: world
Organization: Center for Seismic Studies, Arlington, VA
Lines: 5
Keywords: 68000 68020 80386 mac ps/2 apple ibm byte benchmark
Summary: byte magazine is often not worth the paper it's printed on

Reply to Parent Message