🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1053@uhccux.UUCP> cm450s02@uhccux.UUCP (jeff t. segawa) writes:
>>In article <12346169899024@G.BBN.COM>, DREDICK@G.BBN.COM (Donald Redick) writes:
>But of late, (as if you haven't noticed) it has turned into
>a mouthpiece for the IBM Clan..
>(rest of article edited out...)
>
>That may be true of Byte, but have you seen PC Magazine lately? I picked up
>the November 24 issue, which has a PS/2 model 80 / Mac II comparision, which
>despite a few remarks about the "fruit computer" is well written, and    
>surprisingly, a few ads for Mac products have been appearing in these
>pages! I agreed with most of the comments made in the article, particularly
>the comparisons between the fine IBM "enhanced" keyboard, and the so-so
>standard Apple keyboard. (or course we all know that REAL Mac users opt for
>the expanded model, which is one of the best options around for the SE and II.)
	Me, I wouldn't have the extended keyboard if you gave me one.
Function keys are nice to have (a little, they're also user unfriendly
unless clearly labeled and consistently used) but I want the escape, delete/bs,
and control keys in the usual places.  I also have a small desk and the
extended keyboard takes up far too much space.
-- 
	David W. Berry
	dwb@well.uucp                   dwb@Delphi
	dwb@apple.com                   973-5168@408.MaBell
Disclaimer: Apple doesn't even know I have an opinion and certainly
	wouldn't want if they did.