Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #28966Re: some (should-be) ground-rules f
From: gillies
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 1988 16:08
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 1988 16:08
15 lines
1118 bytes
1118 bytes
I recently became interested in writing a compression utility.
But when I benchmarked compress on some digital pictures, I found that
stuffit's LZW algorithm is much more efficient than compress's
algorithm. I'm not sure compress is all that great a program. If you
look at the source code, it's been hacked dozens of times by different
authors at different sites. Data compression methods are heuristics,
and sometimes too many cooks can spoil the pot.
So I'm not voting for making compress a standard. I believe stuffit
is better.
Don Gillies {ihnp4!uiucdcs!gillies} U of Illinois
{gillies@cs.uiuc.edu}
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<76000213@uiucdcsp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ames!umd5!purdue!i.cc.purdue.edu!j.cc.purdue.edu!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uiucdcsp!gilliesReferences:
<643@vsi1.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ames!umd5!purdue!i.cc.purdue.edu!j.cc.purdue.edu!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uiucdcsp!gillies From: gillies@uiucdcsp.cs.uiuc.edu Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: some (should-be) ground-rules f Message-ID: <76000213@uiucdcsp> Date: 9 Jun 88 16:08:00 GMT References: <643@vsi1.UUCP> Lines: 14 Nf-ID: #R:vsi1.UUCP:643:uiucdcsp:76000213:000:623 Nf-From: uiucdcsp.cs.uiuc.edu!gillies Jun 9 11:08:00 1988