Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #18419Re: Byte review. 386 v '020
From: carl m benda
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1987 19:40
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1987 19:40
15 lines
1403 bytes
1403 bytes
In article <116@faccs.UUCP>, dbt@faccs.UUCP (Data base translator ) writes: > Looking at it this way, the '020 not only compares well with the '386; it > blows the socks off its Intel counterpart, the '286. And the '030? I can't > wait. It really angers many people to see blind statements such as yours about the 68020 'blowing the socks off the '286'... In case you hadn't been reading the trade journals. AMD has recently been shipping 16Mhz versions of the 80286 which incidently contains, on the chip, memory management capabilities. Something that the 68020 MUST go off chip for, namely, the 68851 MMU. I believe most net readers would appreciate documented numbers, BEFORE you make any more of these irritable BLIND statements. /Carl ...decvax!mcnc!unnccvax!cbenda
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<799@unccvax.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rutgers!labrea!decwrl!decvax!mcnc!unccvax!cbendaReferences:
<1376@imagen.UUCP> <116@faccs.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rutgers!labrea!decwrl!decvax!mcnc!unccvax!cbenda From: cbenda@unccvax.UUCP (carl m benda) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Byte review. 386 v '020 Message-ID: <799@unccvax.UUCP> Date: Sun, 23-Aug-87 15:40:30 EDT Article-I.D.: unccvax.799 Posted: Sun Aug 23 15:40:30 1987 Date-Received: Mon, 24-Aug-87 03:46:53 EDT References: <1376@imagen.UUCP> <116@faccs.UUCP> Organization: Univ. of NC at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC Lines: 15 Keywords: Benchmarks, 68020, 80386, 68030 Summary: Again... Numbers PLEASE!!