Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #26653CMS Pro80II/i vs. Pro102k-II/i Disks
From: Peter Steele
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 1988 19:49
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 1988 19:49
17 lines
1160 bytes
1160 bytes
CMS sells an internal 80M hard disk with 26ms average access time and
another 102M hard disk with 28ms average access time. Both disks list
at $1695 (there's a 27% educational discount). Other than the slower
speed, is there anything else that makes the 102M drive "inferior" to
their 80M drive. Its tempting to get, but if its noisy or has some
other fault, I'd like to know. So, does anything have any experience
with these two CMS drives?
On another note, how do either of these drives compare with the Jasmine
90M internal (speed and noise)?
--
Peter Steele, Microcomputer Applications Analyst
Acadia University, Wolfville, NS, Canada B0P1X0 (902)542-2201x121
UUCP: {uunet|watmath|utai|garfield}dalcs!aucs!Peter
BITNET: Peter@Acadia Internet: Peter%Acadia.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<987@aucs.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!dalcs!aucs!peterShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!dalcs!aucs!peter From: peter@aucs.UUCP (Peter Steele) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: CMS Pro80II/i vs. Pro102k-II/i Disks Message-ID: <987@aucs.UUCP> Date: 21 Mar 88 19:49:26 GMT Reply-To: peter@aucs.UUCP (Peter Steele) Distribution: na Organization: School of Computer Science, Acadia Univ., Nova Scotia Lines: 17