🚀 go-pugleaf

david@elroy (David Robinson) writes...
> >My personal theory is that Masscomp thinks people will only
> >except fast NFS systems or they want to sell a bunch of
> >301 boards.  If you can live with slower performence then you
> >might not need to buy a 301.
> >
> We, like Sun, believe that most people will not like NFS if it is slow.
> However, the real problem is that we are able to deadlock a 201 board with NFS.
> The limited memory space makes it easy to exhaust the mbuf supply.  
> Unfortunately, it is not easy to define some number of clients or any 
> other simple criterion customers could use to avoid the deadlock
> in all cases.  Yes, the 301 is faster, but more
> importantly it has enough memory to handle NFS traffic loads.
> >
> 
> Alan Atlas
> Supervisor, OS Development
> 

What about a 5500 (68010 cpu) with 4 MB memory, running TCP/IP in kernel
mode?  I believe that the 301 has 1/2 MB of memory, so for my system, the
68010 should suffice, no?

*If* there is a problem with running RT-NFS in kernel mode, then I'm sure
that the beta testers will find this out.  Generally, people should be
given a wide variety of choices (price/performance), and although I don't
think MC will be selling many more 68010 machines, those customers with the
older boxes would *still* like NFS (at a reasonable price).

--mike

Mike Tankenson                Telos/Jet Propulsion Laboratory - NASA
4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA.  91109            (818) 354-1447
Uucp: seismo!cit-vax!jplpro!mike
Arpa: jplpro!mike@cit-vax.ARPA -or- mike@jplpro.JPL.NASA.GOV