Article View: comp.sys.misc
Article #1154Re: FCC proposal again threatens modem users
From: SNELSON
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1987 14:04
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1987 14:04
24 lines
1642 bytes
1642 bytes
In Missouri Southwestern Bell has had a 175% of the cost of a flat rate business line surcharge in effect for 10 years for dial up lines terminating in a computer. We (the Army) challenged this in 1977 through the legal troops. What had really frosted us was that we had 24 dial-up lines terminating in 3 muxes riding an AT&T 209A modem and link to the Wright-Patterson TIP. We paid! It seems the very simple way the tariff was written made anything in Missouri that is directly connected/attached to a computer port gets charged. We have 52 dial in modems and the cost per month isn't cheap. What isn't clear is whether both ends of connection are billed $5 per hour per session or $5 an hour per line regardless of use? How will they differentiate between data and voice as a lot of companies use them alternatively for voice during the day and for data during the low rate periods at night. Take a major programming change for the ESSs to track incoming calls not to mention the billing programs. Some of the older switches are pretty dumb and couldn't even do that. I wonder if the pork barrellers (congress) has EMAIL? Regards Steve
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7830@brl-adm.ARPA>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!adm!SNELSON@STL-HOST1.arpaShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!adm!SNELSON@STL-HOST1.arpa From: SNELSON@STL-HOST1.arpa Newsgroups: comp.sys.misc Subject: Re: FCC proposal again threatens modem users Message-ID: <7830@brl-adm.ARPA> Date: Fri, 12-Jun-87 10:04:58 EDT Article-I.D.: brl-adm.7830 Posted: Fri Jun 12 10:04:58 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 13-Jun-87 20:39:23 EDT Sender: news@brl-adm.ARPA Lines: 24