Article View: comp.sys.misc
Article #1407Re: Guidelines on legal protection for shareware & freeware
From: Chris Gray
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1988 18:34
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1988 18:34
37 lines
2707 bytes
2707 bytes
Mike Meyers has posted a long article which includes some suggestions on
how to set up a license that would require people to pay for shareware that
they use. To me, this doesn't make any sense. I've always thought of
shareware as software that is freely redistributable, and can be used by
anyone, for any purpose (unless a Copyright prohibits something, such as
direct commercial use), but for which the author requests a donation if the
program is found to be useful. Note the word 'requests'. I don't think I've
seen any shareware where the author REQUIRED a donation. I wouldn't call
that shareware, I'd call it a commercial program.
I'm one of those dreaded people who have sent out shareware for the Amiga:
the Draco compiler, and Amiga Empire. I've also sent out some freeware, in
which the documentation (if any!) didn't even request a donation. I'll
likely send out more of both in the future. To me, the difference is this:
- if I label something as shareware, I plan on it being an active project,
and people's suggestions for improvements, bug fixes, etc. will be heeded.
The project is quite large, however, and some sort of reward for my
efforts would be nice. Because of simple human nature, I will pay more
attention to the suggestions of those who send money than to the
suggestions of those who don't (I will also pay more attention to
suggestions I agree with!) Both of the above mentioned shareware items
are things that could have been commercial products, with some effort
spent on documentation and packaging. From what I've heard, the Draco
compiler was stabler on its release than either of the two commercial
C compilers were.
- if I label something as freeware (by not labelling it as shareware, and
by not Copyrighting it), then I'm doing it for fun, and don't much care
about getting rewarded for my efforts. Some people (bless their hearts)
are able to classify all of their work this way. For me, something that
I class as freeware is not likely to be worked on again, unless some
fun-sounding suggestion arouses my interest.
--
Chris Gray Myrias Research, Edmonton +1 403 428 1616
{uunet!mnetor,ubc-vision,watmath,vax135}!alberta!myrias!cg
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<552@myrias.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!hao!gatech!purdue!i.cc.purdue.edu!j.cc.purdue.edu!pur-ee!iuvax!inuxc!ihnp4!alberta!myrias!cgReferences:
<6784@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!hao!gatech!purdue!i.cc.purdue.edu!j.cc.purdue.edu!pur-ee!iuvax!inuxc!ihnp4!alberta!myrias!cg From: cg@myrias.UUCP (Chris Gray) Newsgroups: comp.sys.misc Subject: Re: Guidelines on legal protection for shareware & freeware Message-ID: <552@myrias.UUCP> Date: 4 Feb 88 18:34:44 GMT References: <6784@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> Organization: Myrias Research, Edmonton Lines: 37 Summary: "Shareware" does not REQUIRE a donation