Article View: comp.sys.misc
Article #1618Sun 386i vs. Sun 3
From: Anita Cochran
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 1988 17:26
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 1988 17:26
24 lines
1710 bytes
1710 bytes
The latest issue of Byte magazine has a review of the Sun 386i, which
is their 80386 machine with UNIX and DOS running in a window. I read
the review and it was all oriented towards what the machine can do as
a DOS machine. The final paragraph was something like "Oh incidentally,
this machine runs UNIX too but it takes a guru to set it up". This
seems like a backwards approach to the machine since Sun's forte is
UNIX and isn't it nice you can occasionally run a piece of DOS software
(for certain applications such as database and spreadsheets, there are
more and better programs for DOS).
Now, I am not a UNIX guru but I am a system administrator so I doubt
that I couldn't set things up and run efficiently unless Sun has
done something really strange. Have they? How good a box is the
Sun 386i? Ignoring the DOS aspects, how does the 386i compare
to the standard Sun 3 running on the 68020? The price for the 386i
quoted in Byte looked quite high -- ~$18K for the more capable machine.
Can't you do better, price-wise, with a Sun 3/60? Is the 3/60 as
good a machine?
--
Anita Cochran uucp: {noao, ut-sally, ut-emx}!utastro!anita
arpa: anita@astro.as.utexas.edu
snail: Astronomy Dept., The Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX, 78712
at&t: (512) 471-1471
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2833@utastro.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-sally!utastro!anitaShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-sally!utastro!anita From: anita@utastro.UUCP (Anita Cochran) Newsgroups: comp.sys.misc Subject: Sun 386i vs. Sun 3 Keywords: Byte review, comparison wanted Message-ID: <2833@utastro.UUCP> Date: 30 Jun 88 17:26:59 GMT Organization: U. Texas, Astronomy, Austin, TX Lines: 24