Article View: comp.sys.misc
Article #1691Re: Looking for a cheap 4.3 Unix box...
From: Jonathan E. Brickman
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 1988 17:02
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 1988 17:02
22 lines
1623 bytes
1623 bytes
In article <6831@potomac.ads.com> jtn@potomac.ads.com (John T. Nelson) writes:
>I'm sortof kindof thinking about buying a cheap Unix box.
> 1) Bitmapped screen
> 2) MUST run 4.3 Berkeley (none of this system V junk).
> 3) Inexpensive (and built to stay thatway)
The least expensive graphics-oriented Unix box with any 4.3 BSD
compatibility that I've heard of is the Mac II. A/UX is System V
-based, but the Byte review mentioned signals and sockets as
a "Berkeley Unix compatibility add-on". In other words, it sounds
like the lowest-end BSD-like system around. I personally don't
like A/UX very much, because it is not decently integrated with
the rest of the Mac environment; however, bang for the buck
is very good.
The lowest-end system I like in the BSD graphics league is
the Sun 3/60, advertised last year with 4 megs RAM, mono 1152 X 900
screen, 18 MHz (I think) 68020, and 70 megs disk, for $6000. Mono screen,
without color emulation, means rotten CAD etc., but for something
like $1000 you get the Sun 1152 X 900 X 8-out-of-24-bit beauty.
If you want more universal compatibility, a Sun mono 386i with most of
the above, running a 16 MHz 80386 and 80 megs, is $10,000.
||Jonathan E. Brickman
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<606@rtg.cme-durer.ARPA>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cme-durer!brickmanReferences:
<6831@potomac.ads.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cme-durer!brickman From: brickman@cme-durer.ARPA (Jonathan E. Brickman) Newsgroups: comp.sys.misc Subject: Re: Looking for a cheap 4.3 Unix box... Message-ID: <606@rtg.cme-durer.ARPA> Date: 25 Aug 88 17:02:41 GMT References: <6831@potomac.ads.com> Reply-To: brickman@rtg (Jonathan E. Brickman) Organization: The National Bureau of Standards Lines: 22