🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <7261@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM>, jans@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Jan Steinman) writes:
> <mrovner@libserv1.ic.sunysb.edu (Marc D Rovner)>
> 
> <Two years ago the FCC tried and (with your help and letters of protest) failed 
> to institute regulations that would impose additional costs on modem users for 
> data communications.  Now, they are at it again.>
> 
> Ummm...  I think this is a hoax, or perhaps just a preemptive strike.  It was 
> debunked soundly in rec.ham-radio recently.  As one who has taken part in the 

 This is getting monotonous.... This is, lets see, the fourth time this
popped up in the net in the past 6 months. NO such rulemaking is
pending. There IS no docket number. Some kind soul probably saw this
somewhere, assumed it was real and happening now, posted it to a BBS,
someone with net access saw it, went into terminal panic overload, 
posted it and on, and on, and on..... 

I just realized we're coming up on a full moon. Maybe THAT'S a good
excuse for this to pop up again....  <sigh>
 

            *>> Dave <<*

[------: Dave Ratcliffe :---------:---: UUCP: uunet!wa3wbu!compnect!dave :----]
:                                 : 2832 Croyden Rd.  Harrisburg, Pa. 17104   :
:                                 :   Data: (717)657-4997 - (717)657-4992     :
[.................................:...........................................]