Article View: comp.sys.newton.misc
Article #18Re: Users are selfish Was Re: crippled software
From: John Schettino
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 10:24
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 10:24
47 lines
2853 bytes
2853 bytes
In article <31415062.5EC2@netcom.ca>, Aristophanes <scribe@netcom.ca> wrote: (Edited) > Dan Parvaz wrote: > > | Why not be a freeware programmer instead? > > > > I'm afriad that's our business, not yours. Fact is, a lot of shareware > > programmers *do* release freeware. But that really has to be our > > decision, not to be dictated at the whim at someone who seems to glory in > > his petty larceny. > I'd like to know if crippled shareware is more profitable than freeware with > an asked for donation. Anyone? Yes, shareware is more profitable than freeware. My Calendar Marker (not crippled, but $10) yeilded 20 registrations (and 400+ downloads from AOL alone). I also released two freeware hacks (quick-all names and notes and another one who's name escapes me) that I received $0 for ;) I've found it is more profitable to write words about programming the Newton then it is to program shareware. Sad but true. My usualy PDA Developers article includes an app (with source) that is about 70% of a "real" application. I get paid more to write the article and give away the source than I ever would releasing it as shareware. (Actually, Calendar Marker began life as a PDA Developers article on "hacking".) > > I'd also like to point out that some of the best "shareware" stuff I've seen > are hacks and cracks. Guilty. > And, finally, I think that the real people who proit from shareware are those > who pay the authors next-to-nothing for putting the stuff on CD-ROM's in > gobs, and then charge a fortune via mail-order. That's a classic case of the > middleman defeating the origins of the shareware concept. Not really. After AMUG put out their CDROM with my CM on it, I got another 5 or 6 registrations. That's about par for the course. > Sigh. I like much of the shareware I see. But the ONLY time I sent ayone any > money.......it was returned due to change of address. Try again ;) Catamont and Stand-alone are good companies, as are a lot of other individual shareware authors. ==-- John Schettino HomePage: http://members.aol.com/pdcjohns
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<js12-1003960624090001@pppdyn5.gte.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!pppdyn5.gte.com!userReferences:
<150773@cup.portal.com> <4lCkP4eSMV1ZEHpSJ2@transarc.com> <ud4ts37sru.fsf@random.pc-labor.uni-bremen.de> <4hllsv$gc8@cantua.canterbury.ac.nz> <4hmvq7$5qm@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU> <5r68cgwjsj.fsf_-_@ritz.mordor.com> <badger.826246592@phylo.life.uiuc.edu> <dparvaz-0803961941040001@user176.fiber.net> <31415062.5EC2@netcom.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!pppdyn5.gte.com!user From: js12@gte.com (John Schettino) Newsgroups: comp.sys.newton.misc,comp.sys.amiga.applications Subject: Re: Users are selfish Was Re: crippled software Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 06:24:08 -0400 Organization: GTE Laboratories, Inc. Message-ID: <js12-1003960624090001@pppdyn5.gte.com> References: <150773@cup.portal.com> <4lCkP4eSMV1ZEHpSJ2@transarc.com> <ud4ts37sru.fsf@random.pc-labor.uni-bremen.de> <4hllsv$gc8@cantua.canterbury.ac.nz> <4hmvq7$5qm@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU> <5r68cgwjsj.fsf_-_@ritz.mordor.com> <badger.826246592@phylo.life.uiuc.edu> <dparvaz-0803961941040001@user176.fiber.net> <31415062.5EC2@netcom.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: pppdyn5.gte.com