Article View: comp.sys.next.hardware
Article #1044Re: New SPARC Classic
From: Robert Stephen Rodgers
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 16:36
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 16:36
60 lines
2943 bytes
2943 bytes
In article <1dtuk5INNot8@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> isbell@cats.ucsc.edu (Art Isbell) writes: > My own sense in all this is that a company NeXT's size cannot possibly compete > in all arenas of workstation production with companies 1 or 2 orders of > magnitude greater in size (like Sun, IBM, DEC, HP, etc.). NeXT simply must > concentrate on a subset of what workstation production entails, and excel in > those areas. Like always, things in this message are IMHO. Btw: Anyone know if HP is still getting creamed? Even with their price cuts (hell, surgery) on their PC systems, their only real successful division these last two years seems to have been printers... Anyone? <And boy is the HP LJ 4 sweet.> Next has a user interface for people who don't want to pick and poke and hack and spooze over autoexec.bat's and system errors. Hell, I've only managed to bring down the NeXT that I use (without trying) once or twice (but it was _down_, as in, not responsing to the power-up/down key.. What idiot threw out the idea of a hardware reset....)... Good for them, but it's not going to win them the workstation market, which is an eat-'em up and spit-'em out kind of market. > Apparently, Bud Tribble felt that Jobs overemphasized hardware versus software > development and resigned when this disagreement couldn't be resolved. I am > leaning more and more toward Tribble's point of view. Hardware is becoming a > commodity item, whereas software (NeXT's real strength) is where NeXT should be > concentrating. Hardware is a commodity to a point. This is true. But NeXT (and users) has a much easier time is the base hardware is in some way standard. I think that with NT and multiplatform OS/2, you're going to start seeing the underlying hardware become unimportant _for awhile_ but them pretty much heterogenize as users--now that they're using the same software--want to use peripherals as well. At least it leaves some room for creativity.... -- Robert Stephen Rodgers || rsrodger@wam.umd.edu || IRC: Yamanari --------NeXTmail-preferred!!-------------------------------------- Snout: O Bottom, thou art chang'd! What do I see on thee? Bottom: What do you see? You see an ass-head of your own, do you? Q: What did the academic say to the art major? A: "I'll take a big mac and fries."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov12.163643.6203@wam.umd.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!wam.umd.edu!usenetReferences:
<1dtuk5INNot8@darkstar.UCSC.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.hardware Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!wam.umd.edu!usenet From: rsrodger@next10csc.wam.umd.edu (Robert Stephen Rodgers) Subject: Re: New SPARC Classic Message-ID: <1992Nov12.163643.6203@wam.umd.edu> Sender: usenet@wam.umd.edu (USENET News system) Nntp-Posting-Host: next09csc.wam.umd.edu Organization: Workstations at Maryland, University of Maryland, College Park References: <1dtuk5INNot8@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 16:36:43 GMT Lines: 60