Re: New SPARC Classic

Article View: comp.sys.next.hardware

Article #1070

Back to comp.sys.next.hardware Previous Next

#1070

From: Christopher Songer
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 21:05

13 lines
1168 bytes

In article <1992Nov12.173445.22519@socrates.umd.edu> ice@socrates.umd.edu (Fredrik Nyman) writes:
>
>It uses a Tsunami SPARC chip at 50 MHz.  CPU performance is virtually
>equivalent to the SPARCStation 2, so yes, I stand by my above assertion
>that the SSC will have roughly twice the CPU performance of NSTC for
>roughly half the price. :-(
>

Yes, I caught that from subseqent announcements. The published Spec
numder mean that NeXT's hardware is toast. Next had better cough up
something really good really fast or they could be in trouble.

-Chris

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Nov13.210502.134324@lexmark.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ukma!lexmark!songer

References:

<1992Nov12.020041.23522@socrates.umd.edu> <1992Nov12.125406.102394@lexmark.com> <1992Nov12.173445.22519@socrates.umd.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.hardware
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ukma!lexmark!songer
From: songer@lexmark.com (Christopher Songer)
Subject: Re: New SPARC Classic
Message-ID: <1992Nov13.210502.134324@lexmark.com>
X-Disclaimer: These views are the poster's and not necessarily those of Lexmark
Keywords: sun, classic, sparc
Sender: usenet@lexmark.com (News Dude)
Nntp-Posting-Host: 9.51.7.57
Organization: Lexington, KY
References: <1992Nov12.020041.23522@socrates.umd.edu> <1992Nov12.125406.102394@lexmark.com> <1992Nov12.173445.22519@socrates.umd.edu>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 21:05:02 GMT
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message