Re: Nitro

Article View: comp.sys.next.hardware

Article #1179

Back to comp.sys.next.hardware Previous Next

#1179

From: felix.lugo
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 1992 19:04

14 lines
963 bytes

In article <1992Oct4.133355.861@next.cambridge.ma.us> simsong@next.cambridge.ma.us writes:
>
>Going to the ADB keyboard (see my article in NeXTWORLD) is very, very good.
>
>-- 
>
>................................................................simson

	I haven't read YOUR article, but I've seen the technical specs from
NeXT on them and frankly don't see the point.  What makes them very, very good?
My old-style keyboard serves its purpose well, and I could care less about
ADB compatibility.  So what's the scoop?

--Felix

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Oct4.190419.19772@cbnewsl.cb.att.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnews!cbnewsm!cbnewsl!coco

References: <dillon.0oq2@overload.Berkeley.CA.US> <1992Oct4.133355.861@next.cambridge.ma.us>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.hardware
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnews!cbnewsm!cbnewsl!coco
From: coco@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (felix.lugo)
Subject: Re: Nitro
Organization: AT&T
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1992 19:04:19 GMT
Message-ID: <1992Oct4.190419.19772@cbnewsl.cb.att.com>
References: <dillon.0oq2@overload.Berkeley.CA.US> <1992Oct4.133355.861@next.cambridge.ma.us>
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message